|

Prospecting
2.0
By
Evan Sohn (Guest
Author)
Salesconx,
CEO
Web
2.0 is a shift in the way businesses think
and leverage the Internet. Sales 2.0 is a
shift in the way that businesses manage
their sales forces and leads. But is there a
Prospecting 2.0?
Not
too long ago (say 1990) if we wanted to
drive leads for our business we would send
out postcards. Really great looking
postcards. We would send out thousands of
them, hoping for a 1% response rate. Online
postcard companies that would send the
postcards out for you automated this
process. These companies would even provide
the mailing list. Over the years, these
organizations morphed into email houses and
other eMarketing shops.
Prospecting 1.0 moved us onto the
“internet superhighway” with online
seminars (webinars). No longer limited to an
in-person seminar in multiple local cities
(can anyone else say 10 city seminars in 4
weeks?) the Internet allowed us to produce
an online version of our in-person seminar.
These of course became so dry that we
supplemented the rather poor attendance with
recordings that became available ‘on
demand’. Prospective 1.0 eventually led to
Podcasts and who (other than me) doesn’t
want to listen to selling training materials
on their iPod?

Web 2.0 has created a more open approach to
the Internet, in particular user-generated
content, blogs, podcasts, social media,
review sites, Wikipedia, etc. Prospecting
1.0 has clearly benefiting from Web 2.0
trends as companies are using the social
networks to drive business (certainly the
recruiting industry and consultants are benefiting
from social networks). Sales 2.0 brought
together discrete marketing and sales tools
into a single framework (think
Salesforce.com, WebEx and Genius) and thus
the Sales 2.0 sales force leverages the
activity from Web 2.0 venues (such as Blogs)
to deliver leads to the sales team. Web 2.0
was a real paradigm shift as
consumer-oriented venues (Facebook for
instance) are being leveraged for
businesses. Companies started thinking about
their social media coverage the same way
they measure their public relations (print)
coverage. But there has not been a shift in
the way that prospecting occurs – it is
very much the same formula; response to lead
to qualified lead to warm lead to hot lead
to opportunity to hot opportunity to deal.
Many people have written about these steps
(from Miller Heimen to Siebel) but let’s
assume these are pretty much the steps. Web
2.0 has given more ways for responses to
occur – from clicks, to blog posts, to
downloads and web responses. These build on
the direct mail response leads from the
early 90s but in the end are still just
responses. Shouldn’t the Internet be able
to shift the way that people prospect for
business the same way the recruiters now
fish for candidates across LinkedIn?
Prospecting 2.0 is the new trend in allowing
buyers to reach decision makers without the
need for the first 3 steps of the marketing
equation (response – lead – qualified
lead). This is actually the most costly area
of the marketing process. Think of how much
you spent on your last Google PPC campaign
and how many qualified leads were generated
from that campaign. Think of how much you
spent to exhibit at your most recent
tradeshow and the number of qualified leads
that were generated from that event. Web 2.0
has created an environment where one could
easily leverage what we will call human
capital. This started with eBay (albeit Web
1.0) where your ‘stuff’ is valuable
because there is someone willing to purchase
it. Prosper.com created a marketplace where
your liquid cash can be ‘sold’ for
higher interest rates because there is
someone willing to pay a premium for a loan.
More recently expert networks have become a
common place where professionals could earn
extra money (often referred to as an
honorarium) by speaking to companies looking
to leverage their knowledge (check out
glgroup.com). Prior to an expert network a
company would have no alternative but to
hire a consulting firm whose analysts would
serve as the industry experts on the desired
subject. The analysts would do their
research gathering information on their own
and sifting through the bits and pieces to
come up with their own conclusions that they
would share with their clients for a very
hefty fee. Online expert networks (the Web
2.0 flavor) bypass the analysts and
consulting firms connecting the company
directly with the industry expert
.
Prospecting 2.0 works in a similar vein.
Rather than a company using Google or other
traditional marketing tools to drive
responses, leads, etc. they bypass them by
going directly to the source of the
opportunity. They do this by creating a
marketplace for referrals driven either by
the buyer (of the qualified leads) or the
seller. Companies like Myndnet, LeadVine and
ThePerfectNetworker allow buyers to
literally publish their lead request and the
fee they are willing to pay for the
referral. Companies like Inquisix and
Passitto take the sellers approach by
allowing a seller to list their referral or
contact opportunity and allowing buyers to
purchase their connections. Companies like
Salesconx do both buy and sell introductions
to decision makers. Are they working? It is
probably too early to tell as a sector, but
$10 billion will be spent in 2008 by
businesses in the US on lead and opportunity
generation. Checking out these companies
sites, it isn’t just small businesses
using these services. Myndnet has a few
listings from Netscout, Passitto has a law
firm, and Salesconx has Administaff,
MessageLabs and Berlin Pacific. Companies of
all sizes are faced with the constant
struggle and desire to grow. In a day and
age when every dollar counts, isn’t it
time for Prospecting 2.0?
About
Evan Sohn: I’ve
been called a “veteran
entrepreneur” and “visionary
executive and expert” in industries
as far and wide as Wi-Fi and Instant
Messaging data security, business
intelligence, customer relationship
management (CRUM), handheld
development and mobile computing. I
founded Salesconx
in 2007 after conducting extensive
evaluations on database networking
systems - this is my 5th company. For
me, finding the precise sales contact
within an organization was a critical
but challenging task, consuming
copious time and vast amounts of
money.
After consulting with peers and
considering more than 14 million sales
professionals in the U.S., I developed
a Web portal brokering relationships
between sales associates and buyers.
Prior to founding Salesconx,
I was a senior management and
marketing executive. From 2003-2006, I
acted as Chief Marketing Officer of
Omnipod, the service provider of
secure enterprise instant messaging,
which was acquired by MessageLabs
in 2005.
When I’m not starting new
ventures, I’m a 40 year old father
of 3 great kids. My success can only
be accomplished with the support of an
amazing wife.
|